Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 16/2016(International issue no. 4):54-65 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2016.009

Love as Desire of the Good or Love as Value-response? Plato and von Hildebrand on the Essence of Love

Martin Cajthaml
Cyrilometodějská teologická fakulta CMTF

The aim of this paper is to compare Plato's and Dietrich von Hildebrand's philosophical account of the essence of love. The author proceeds by gradually working out the similarities and differences between the two accounts of love and by attempting to explain the differences between them, partly by identifying the different metaphysical assumptions of both authors. The main philosophical interest of this paper lies in showing how, in these two philosophical accounts of love, elements of desire of the object of love and elements of responsiveness to its value are contained, although, in each of the accounts, in different way and with different final outcome.

Published: September 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cajthaml, M. (2016). Love as Desire of the Good or Love as Value-response? Plato and von Hildebrand on the Essence of Love. Aither8(16), 54-65. doi: 10.5507/aither.2016.009
Download citation

References

  1. Cajthaml, M. (2005). "On the Relationship Between Pederasty and Plato's Philosophical Theory of Love In: A. Havlíček, M. Cajthaml (eds.), Plato's Symposium. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, Praha: OIKOYMENH, pp. 108-124.
  2. Cajthaml, M. (2010). "Láska jako 'odpověď na hodnotu'. Filosofie lásky Dietricha von Hildebranda." (Love as a Value-Response. Dietrich von Hildebrand's Philosophy of Love). Reflexe 39, pp. 20-28.
  3. Havlíček, A., Cajthaml, M. (eds.) (2005). Plato's Symposium. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  4. Hildebrand, D. von (1969). Die Idee der Sittlichen Handlung, Sittlichkeit und ethische Werterkenntnis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 131-137.
  5. Hildebrand, D. von (2009). The Nature of Love (trans. by John F. Crosby with John H. Crosby). South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine's Press.
  6. Karfík, F. (2005). "Éros et l'âme". In: A. Havlíček, M. Cajthaml (eds.), Plato's Symposium. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum Pragense, Praha: OIKOYMENH, pp. 147-163.
  7. Platone. (2001). Simposio (trans. G. Reale). Milano: Mondadori.
  8. Premoli De Marchi, P. (1998). Uomo e relazione. L'antropologia filosofica di Dietrich von Hildebrand. Milano: Fanco Angeli.
  9. Reale, G. (1997a). Eros demone mediatore. Il gioco delle maschere nel Simposio. Milano: Rizzoli.
  10. Reale, G. (1997b). Per una nuova interpretazione di Platone. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  11. Seifert, J. (1989). Essere e persona. Verso una fondazione fenomenologica di una metafisica classica e personalistica. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.