Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 24/2020 (International issue no. 8):232-248 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2020.013

The Monstrosity of Vice: Sin and Slavery in Campanella's Political Thought

Brian Garcia
University of the Incarnate Word

This paper opens by reviewing Aristotle's conception of the natural slave and then familiar treatments of the internal conflict between the ruling and subject parts of the soul in Aristotle and Plato; I highlight especially the figurative uses of slavery and servitude when discussing such problems pertaining to incontinence and vice-viz., being a 'slave' to the passions. Turning to Campanella, features of the City of the Sun pertaining to slavery are examined: in sketching his ideal city, Campanella both rejects Aristotle's natural slave and is critical of the European institutions of slavery. The fact that slavery has no place in the City of the Sun takes on added significance when complemented with Campanella's remarks on dominion and servitude in his Quaestiones de politiciis: I show that Campanella's conception of slavery is intimately bound to sin, and consider whether his employment of the trope of slavery within the context of vice diverges from familiar usage.

Published: September 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Garcia, B. (2020). The Monstrosity of Vice: Sin and Slavery in Campanella's Political Thought. Aither12(24), 232-248. doi: 10.5507/aither.2020.013
Download citation

References

  1. Aristotle (1984). Complete Works (ed. J. Barnes). 2 vols. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  2. Blum, P. R. (2017). "The Economy of Slavery in Campanella's Political Thought". Bruniana & Campanelliana 23, pp. 563-572.
  3. Campanella, T. (1637). Disputationum in quatuor partes suae Philosophiae Realis, libri quatuor. Paris: Dionysius Houssaye.
  4. Campanella, T. (2008). La Città del Sole/Civitas Solis, il manoscritto della prima redazione italiana (1602) e l'ultima edizione a stampa (1637) (ed. T. Tornitore). Torino: Aragno.
  5. Campanella, T. (2013). Tre questioni politiche contro Aristotele (ed. G. Ernst). Pisa / Roma: Serra.
  6. Headley, J. M. (1991). "On Reconstructing the Citizenry: Campanella's Criticism of Aristotle's Politics". Il Pensiero Politico 24, pp. 28-41.
  7. Heath, M. (2008). "Aristotle on Natural Slavery". Phronesis 53, pp. 243-270. Go to original source...
  8. Mahoney, E. P. (2004). "Aristotle and Some Late Medieval and Renaissance Philosophers" IN: R. Pozzo (ed.), T he Impact of Aristotelianism on Modern Philosophy, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, pp. 1-34. Go to original source...
  9. Pellegrin, P. (2013). "Natural Slavery". IN: M. Deslauriers, & P. Destrée (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle's, Cambridge University Press, pp. 92-116.
  10. Plato (1997). Complete Works (ed. J. M. Cooper). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.