Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 16/2016(International issue no. 4):32-53 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2016.008

Methodology of the History of Philosophy: A Different Approach to the Philosophy of Heraclitus

David Černín
Filozofická fakulta, Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě

The focus of this paper is twofold: First, it focuses on the ongoing debates concerning the methodology of the history of philosophy. Second, it demonstrates its findings on a specific case - philosophy of Heraclitus of Ephesus. The author maintains that the history of philosophy is a member of a broader set of disciplines and sciences - the historical disciplines. As such, the history of philosophy shares some obstacles and methods with those disciplines. The paper follows proposals from philosophy of historiography and tries to show how those proposals are manifested in the work of Quentin Skinner. His approach is summarized with respect to recent development and then applied to the fragments of Heraclitus of Ephesus. It is argued that politics and ethics had an important place in Heraclitus' philosophy and that it is worthwhile to try to recognize the situation in Ephesus, which is referenced by Heraclitus many times. Conclusions from this endeavor may provide some non-trivial interpretations of Heraclitus.

Published: September 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Černín, D. (2016). Methodology of the History of Philosophy: A Different Approach to the Philosophy of Heraclitus. Aither, 8(16), 32-53. doi: 10.5507/aither.2016.008
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) (1989). Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press.
    2. Beall, J., Armour-Garb, B. (eds.) (2006). Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon.
    3. Bianchi, C. (2003). "How to Refer: Objective Context vs. Intentional Context". In: P. Blackburn, C. Ghidini, R. M. Turner, F. Giunchiglia (eds.), Modeling and Using Context, Berlin: Springer, pp. 54-65. Go to original source...
    4. Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R. M., Giunchiglia F. (eds.) (2003). Modeling and Using Context. Berlin: Springer. Go to original source...
    5. Collingwood, R. G. (1994). Idea of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
    6. Diels, H., Kranz, W. (1969). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Zürich: Weidmann.
    7. Diogenes Laertius (1972). Lives of Eminent Philosophers (trans. R. D. Hicks). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    8. Fattal, M. (2011). Parole et actes chez Héraclite: sur les fondements théoriques de l'action morale. Paris: Harmattan.
    9. Finkelberg, A. (2013). "Heraclitus, the Rival of Pythagoras", in: D. Sider, D. Obbink (eds.) (2013), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 147-162. Go to original source...
    10. Foucault, M. (1996). L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
    11. Gadamer, H.-G. (1960). Hermeneutik I: Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: Mohr.
    12. Gauker, C. (2006). "Semantics for Deflationists". In: J. Beall, B. Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflationism and Paradox, Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 148-176.
    13. Glock, H.-J. (2008) What is analytic philosophy?. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    14. Goldstein, L. J. (1976). Historical Knowing. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    15. Goldstein, L. J. (1996). The What and The Why of History. Leiden: E. J. Brill. Go to original source...
    16. Goodhart, M. (2000). "Theory in Practice: Quentin Skinner's Hobbes, Reconsidered". The Review of Politics 62, pp. 531-561. Go to original source...
    17. Herodotus (1920-1925). Herodotus in four volumes (trans. A. D. Godley). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    18. Hussey, E. (1982). "Epistemology and meaning in Heraclitus". In: M. Schofield, M. C. Nussbaum (eds.), Language and Logos: studies in ancient Greek philosophy presented to G. E. L. Owen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-60. Go to original source...
    19. Kahn, C. H. (1979). The art and thought of Heraclitus: an edition of the fragments with translation and commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    20. Kaukua, J., Lähteenmäki V. (2010). "Subjectivity as a Non-Textual Standard of Interpretation in the History of Philosophical Psychology". History and Theory 49, pp. 21-37. Go to original source...
    21. Kessidi, F. C. (1985). Hérakleitos (trans. I. ©terková). Prague: Svoboda.
    22. Kratochvíl, Z. (2006). Délský potápěč k Hérakleitově řeči. Prague: Hermann & synové.
    23. Lamb, R. (2009). "Quentin Skinner's revised historical contextualism: a critique". History of the Human Sciences 22, pp. 51-73. Go to original source...
    24. Leslie, M. (1970). "In Defense of Anachronism". Political Studies 18, pp. 433-447. Go to original source...
    25. Lewontin, R. C. (1991). "Facts and the Factitious in Natural Sciences". Critical Inquiry 18, pp. 140-153. Go to original source...
    26. Millican, P. (2007). "Against the New Hume". in: R. Read, K., Richman (eds.), The New Hume Debate, Rev. ed, London: Routledge, pp. 211-252.
    27. Murphey, M. G. (2008). Truth and History. New York: SUNY Press.
    28. Pliny the Elder (1906). Naturalis Historia (trans. K. F. T. Mayhoff). Lipsiae: Teubner.
    29. Popper, K. (2002). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.
    30. Read, R., Richman, K. (eds.) (2007). The New Hume Debate. Rev. ed. London: Routledge.
    31. Rorty, R. (1984). "The historiography of philosophy: four genres". In: R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, Q. Skinner (eds.), Ideas in Context: Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49-76. Go to original source...
    32. Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., Skinner, Q. (eds.) (1984). Ideas in Context: Philosophy in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    33. Sandywell, B. (1996). Presocratic Reflexivity: The Construction of Philosophical Discourse c. 600-450 B.C.: Logological Investigations. Volume Three. London: Routledge.
    34. Schneewind, J. B. (2005). "Globalization and the History of Philosophy". Journal of the History of Ideas 66, pp. 169-178. Go to original source...
    35. Schofield, M., Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.) (1982). Language and Logos: studies in ancient Greek philosophy presented to G. E. L. Owen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    36. Sider, D. (2013). "Heraclitus' Ethics" In: D. Sider, D. Obbink (eds.) (2013), Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 321-334. Go to original source...
    37. Sider, D., Obbink, D. (eds.) (2013). Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Berlin: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    38. Skinner, Q. (1969). "Meaning an Understanding in the History of Ideas". History and Theory 8, pp. 3-53. Go to original source...
    39. Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics. Volume 1, Regarding Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    40. ©pelda, D. (2009). "Po bitvě generálem: Anachronismy v dějinách vědy". Aluze 2, pp. 56-72.
    41. Tucker, A. (2004). Our knowledge of the Past, Philosophy of Historiography. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    42. Tucker, A. (2011) "Historical Science, Over- and Underdetermined: A Study of Darwin's Inference of Origins". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, pp. 805-829. Go to original source...
    43. West, M. L. (1971). Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    44. White, H. (1973). Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    45. Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content