Aither je odborný elektronický časopis zařazený do databází ERIH+ a Scopus. Je vydáván Filozofickou fakultou Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci ve spolupráci s Filosofickým ústavem Akademie věd ČR. Vychází dvakrát ročně. Každé druhé číslo je mezinárodní (International Issue) a jsou v něm publikovány cizojazyčné články (především v angličtině, ale i v němčině a francouzštině). Časopis je registrován pod číslem ISSN 1803-7860.

Na úvodní straně naleznete nejnovější mezinárodní číslo, nejnovější české číslo najdete v archivu.

Aither 12/2014 (International issue no. 3):54-75 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2014.018

Veritas Rerum vs Mens Philosophorum? The Debate on the Immortality of the Soul in Italy after the Publication of the Bull Apostolici regiminis (1513): Cajetan, Pomponazzi, Spina, Prierias, Javelli

Annalisa Cappiello
Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul Rinascimento

The paper shows a comparison between five Renaissance authors - four Thomists (Cajetan, Spina, Prierias, Javelli) and a secular Aristotelian (Pomponazzi) - on the issue of the interpretation of the Aristotelian psychology, that is, whether it is in favor or against the possibility of providing a demonstration of the immortality of the human soul, in the light of the ecclesiastical sanction on this topic. With the papal bull Apostolici regiminis (19 December 1513), the Church had dogmatized the Aristotelian-Thomistic formulation of the ontological status of the human soul (the soul is essentially the form of the body, immortal, infused by God, multiplied for the number of men), thus endorsing the immortalistic reading of Aristotle's statements handed down by Thomas Aquinas. The present investigation seeks to develop the arguments of each of the authors and to elaborate their compatibility and distinctness. On the one hand, there are Cajetan and Pomponazzi, supporters of a mortalistic exegesis of Aristotle and of the inability to provide proof of the immortality of the soul on the basis of the Peripatetic philosophy. On the other hand, there are Spina, Prierias and Javelli, supporters of the classical Thomistic interpretation of Aristotle, albeit with some significant differences. Spina exposes the difficulty to save the agreement between reason and Revelation without the authority of the Stagirite; Prierias especially emphasizes the need to preserve the truth of faith regardless of what is considered to be the opinion of the great philosophers of the past; Javelli expressly acknowledges the limitations of the Aristotelian philosophy when there is no supervision of the Christian exegete.

Zveřejněno: 30. září 2014  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cappiello, A. (2014). Veritas Rerum vs Mens Philosophorum? The Debate on the Immortality of the Soul in Italy after the Publication of the Bull Apostolici regiminis (1513): Cajetan, Pomponazzi, Spina, Prierias, Javelli. Aither, 6(12), 54-75. doi: 10.5507/aither.2014.018
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Amann, É. (1939-41). "Spina". In: Dictionnaire de théologie catholique t. XIV, p. II. Paris: Letouzey et Ané, pp. 2479-2480.
    2. Aquino, de T. (1984). Sententia libri de anima. In: Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. XLV/1, cura et studio Fratrum Praedicatorum. Roma-Paris: Commissio Leonina/Vrin.
    3. Arnold, C. (2010). "De Vio". In: A. Prosperi (ed.), Dizionario storico dell'Inquisizione, vol. 1. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, pp. 471-473.
    4. Bianchi, L. (2008). Pour une histoire de la "double verité". Paris: Vrin.
    5. Caietanus, T. de V. (1580). Oratio IIII De immortalitate animorum coram Julio ii, Pontifice Maximo, Dominica prima adventus anno Salutis MDIII habita. In: Opuscula omnia Thomae De Vio Caietani Cardinalis Sancti Sixti. Venetijs: apud haeredem Hieronymi Scoti, foll. 98r-98v.
    6. Caietanus, T. de V. (1639). In omnes Pauli et aliorum Apostolorum epistolas commentarii. In: Opera omnia quotquot in Sacrae Scripturae in expositionem reperiuntur, t. 5. Lugduni: sumpt. Iacobi & Petri Prost.
    7. Caietanus, T. de V. (1749). Commentaria in omnes libros Aristotelis De anima. Venetiis: ex officina Valuasensiana.
    8. Caietanus, T. de V. (1938). Scripta Philosophica. Commentaria in De anima Aristotelis (ed. P. I. Coquelle), vol. I. Romae: Angelicum.
    9. Caietanus, T. de V. (1965). Commentaria in libros Aristotelis De anima. Liber 3 (ed. G. Picard, J. Pelland). Bruges-Paris: Desclèe de Brouwer.
    10. Cappiello, A., Lamanna, M. (2014). “"Il principio dell'unicità del vero dalla bolla Apostolici regiminis (1513) alla Rivoluzione scientifica". Quaestio, 13, pp. 325-352. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Chenu, D. (1925). "Javelli". In: Dictionnaire de théologie catholique, t. 8, p. I. Paris: Letouzey et Ané. cols. 535-537.
    12. Congar, M. J. (1934-35). "Bio-bibliographie de Cajétan". Revue Thomiste, 17, pp. 3-49.
    13. Constant, E. A. (2002). "A Reinterpretation of the Fifth Lateran Council Decree Apostolici regiminis (1513)". Sixteenth Century Journal, XXXIII/2, pp. 353-378. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Cossio, A. (1902). Il cardinale Gaetano e la Riforma. Cividale: Tipografia Giovanni Fulvio.
    15. Di Napoli, G. (1963). "La polemica pomponazziana". In: L'immortalità dell'anima nel Rinascimento. Torino: SEI, pp. 277-338.
    16. Duni, M. (2010). "Spina". In: A. Prosperi (ed.), Dizionario storico dell'Inquisizione, vol. 3. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, pp. 1471-1472.
    17. Giacon, C. (2001). La seconda scolastica t. 1. Torino: Aragno.
    18. Gilson, É. (1955). "Cajétan et l'humanisme théologique". Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littèraire du Moyen Age, 22, pp. 113-136.
    19. Gilson, É. (1961). "Autour de Pomponazzi. Problématique de l'immortalité de l'ame en Italie au début du XVIe siècle". Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littèraire du Moyen Age, 28, pp. 163-279.
    20. Gilson, É. (1963). "L'affaire de l'immortalité de l'âme à Venise au début du XVIe siècle". V. Branca (ed.), Umanesimo Europeo e Umanesimo Veneziano. Firenze: Sansoni, pp. 31-61.
    21. Javellus, C. (1536). Tractatus de animae humanae indeficientia, in quatruplici via s. peripatetica, academica, naturali, et Christiana, revisus per authorem et nunc primo editus. Venetiis: in officina Aureli Pinci Veneti.
    22. Javellus, C. (1552). Super tres libros Aristotelis de anima quaestiones subtilissimae, in quibus carissime resolvuntur dubia Aristotelis et Commentatoris, eaque ut plurimum decisa habentur iuxta Thomisticum dogma. Venetiis: apud Hieronymum Scotum.
    23. Laurent, M.-H. (1934-35). "Les premières biographies de Cajétan". Revue Thomiste, 17, pp. 444-503.
    24. Laurent, M.-H. (1938). Le commentaire de Cajétan sur le. Roma: Scuola tipografica missionaria Domenicana.
    25. Mansi, G. D. (1902). Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 32. Parisiis: Expensis Huberti Welter, Bibliopolae.
    26. Monfasani, J. (1993). "Aristotelians, Platonists and Missing Ockhamists: Philosophical Liberty in Pre-Reformation Italy". Renaissance Quarterly, 46, pp. 247-276. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Offelli, S. (1955). "Il pensiero del Concilio Lateranense V sulla dimostrabilità razionale dell'immortalità dell'anima umana". Studia Patavina, 2, pp. 3-17.
    28. Pine, M. (1986). Pietro Pomponazzi: Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance. Padova: Antenore.
    29. Pomponazzi, P. (1525). Tractatus acutissimi, utillimi et mere peripatetici. Venetijs: impressum arte & sumptibus haeredum quondam domini Octaviani Scoti & sociorum.
    30. Pomponazzi, P. (1999). Trattato sull'immortalità dell'anima (ed. V. P. Compagni). Firenze: Olschki.
    31. Pomponazzi, P. (2014). Tutti i trattati peripatetici (ed. and trans. F. P. Raimondi, M. G. Valverde). Milano: Bompiani.
    32. Prierias, S. (1575). De strigimagarum daemonumque mirandis libri tres, una cum praxi exactissima, et ratione formandi processus contra ipsas, a mendis innumeris, quibus scatebant, in hac ultima impressione purgati, & indice locupletissimo illustrati. Romae: in aedibus Populi Romani.
    33. Spina, B. (1519). Opulscula edita. Venetijs: per Gregorium de Gregorijs.
    34. Stöve, E. (1991). "De Vio". In: Dizionario biografico degli italiani, vol. 39. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 567-578.
    35. Tavuzzi, M. (1990). "Chrysostomus Javelli O.P. (ca. 1470-1538). A Biobibliographical Essay: Part I, Biography". Angelicum, 67, pp. 457-482.
    36. Tavuzzi, M. (1991). "Chrysostomus Javelli O.P. (ca. 1470-1538). A Biobibliographical Essay: Part II, Bibliography". Angelicum, 68, pp. 107-121.
    37. Tavuzzi, M. (1992). "Javelli, Jean-Chrysostome". In: Dictionnaire d'Histoire et de Géographie Ecclésiastiques, vol. 25. Paris: Letouzey et Ané, cols. 563-566.
    38. Tavuzzi, M. (1995). "Silvestro da Prierio and the Pomponazzi Affair". Renaissance and Reformation, 19, pp. 47-61. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Tavuzzi, M. (1997). Prierias. The Life and Works of Silvestro Mazzolini da Prierio (1456-1527). Durham: Duke University Press.
    40. Verga, E. (1935). "L'immortalità dell'anima nel pensiero del card. Gaetano". Rivista di Filosofia neoscolastica, 27, pp. 21-46.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah