Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 14/2015:68-83 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2015.015

Texts that Attempted to Overcome the Order of their World: on Deleuze's Dialectical Interpretation of Plato's Rhetoric

Martin ©vantner
Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni, Katedra sociologie

The aim of the article is to analyze and criticize principles and strategies of reading Plato's dialogues in the tradition of the so-called French poststructuralism and postmodernism, namely in the work of G. Deleuze (The Logic of Sense) and J. F. Lyotard (The Differend). Critical analysis and comparison is based on Deleuze's reading of Plato in structuralist fashion and on Lyotard's interpretation of rhetorics of Platonic texts.

Published: September 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©vantner, M. (2015). Texts that Attempted to Overcome the Order of their World: on Deleuze's Dialectical Interpretation of Plato's Rhetoric. Aither, 7(14), 68-83. doi: 10.5507/aither.2015.015
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Boháček, K. (2010). "Záhadná filopoesie". In: M. Vrabec a kol., Filosofické reflexe umění, Praha: Togga, s. 21-32.
    2. Boháček, K. (2012). "Metoda formální analýzy a její vyuľití při řeąení otázek pravosti a hlavního tématu dialogu". In: J. Jinek, A. Havlíček A., Platónův dialog Hippias Větąí, Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 11-26.
    3. Cassin, B. (ed.) (1992). Nos Grecs et leur modernes: Les Stratégies contenporaines d'appropriation de l'antiquité. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
    4. Crome, K. (2004). Lyotard and the Greek Thought: Sophistry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    5. Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays Critical and Clinical. London: Verso.
    6. Deleuze, G. (2006). Bergsonismus. Praha: Garamond.
    7. Deleuze, G. (2013). Logika smyslu. Praha: Karolinum.
    8. Descombes, V. (1995). Stejné a jiné. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
    9. Fiąerová, M. (2011). "Text, ktorý rozvrátil poriadok svojho světa". Filozofia 66, s. 667-682.
    10. Flaxman, G. (2012). Deleuze and Fabulation of Philosophy: Powers of the False. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    11. Greene, W. Ch. (1953). "Platonism and its critics". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 61, s. 39-71. Go to original source...
    12. Grube, G. M. A. (1926). "On the Authenticity of the Hippias Maior ". The Classical Quarterly 20(3/4), s. 134-148. Go to original source...
    13. Havlíček, A. (2012). Ideje a zboľnost v Platónově dialogu Euthyfrón. Ústí n. Labem: Filozofická fakulta Univerzity J. E. Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem.
    14. Irwin, J. (1997). Reviving an ancient-modern quarrel: a critique of Derrida's reading of Plato and Platoism. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.
    15. Kahn, C. H. (1996). Plato and Socratic Dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    16. Leonard, M. (2010). Derrida and Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    17. Lloyd, P. G. (2013). From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    18. Lyotard, J.-F. (1998). Rozepře. Praha: Filosofia.
    19. Notomi, N. (1999). The Unity of Plato's Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    20. Notopoulos, J. A. (1935). "The Divided Line of the Platonic Tradition". The Journal of Philosophy 31, s. 57-66. Go to original source...
    21. Oesterreich, P. L. (2013). Podoby veřejného rozumu. Filozofičtí učitelé v prostoru politiky. Praha: Petr Rezek.
    22. Roreitner, R. (2010). "Rétorika, hudba a řeč v raných textech z Nietzschovy pozůstalosti". In: F. Nietzsche, Rané texty o hudbě a řeči, Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 51-52.
    23. Salanskis, J.-M. (1978). "Paradoxes, singularité, systémes". Critique 33, s. 649-656.
    24. Serres, M. (1968). La communication. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
    25. Smith, W. (2012). Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Go to original source...
    26. Sweetman, B. (1999). "Postmodernism, Derrida and Différance: A Critique". International Philosophical Quarterly 39, s. 5-18. Go to original source...
    27. Thompson, D. H. (2009). "Coming to terms: Plato's Cratylus in the light of postmodernism". In: S. Shankman (ed.), Plato and Postmodernism, Eugene: Wipf & Stock, s. 122-133.
    28. Timmons (1997). "The Methodological Principles Of Plato And Bergson". Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies 1, s. 147-150.
    29. Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Go to original source...
    30. Wheeler, S. C. (1999). "Derrida's Differance and Plato's Different". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59, s. 999-1013. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content