Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 24/2020 (International issue no. 8):216-230 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2020.012

Francesco Piccolomini's Platonism and Nicolas of Cusa in the "Peripatetic Exercise" of Johannes Jessenius On Divine and Human Philosophy

Tomáš Nejeschleba
Palacky University Olomouc, Department of Philosophy

The aim of the article is to analyse Johannes Jessenius' book (1565-1621) De divina humanaque philosophia (Padua 1591). The book is titled progymnasma peripateticum and was a product of Jessenius' philosophical studies in Padua. Although it was earlier characterized as a disputation written in a traditional Aristotelian- Scholastic way, the analysis shows that Jessenius followed up on Platonising the Aristotelianism of his teacher Francesco Piccolomini and incorporated certain Platonic elements into an Aristotelian pattern. In addition, the book contains passages that appear to be inspired by the works of Nicolas of Cusa at least with respect to philosophical terminology. Jessenius' Padua disputation thus confirms the dissemination of Cusanus' philosophy in 16th century Italy.

Published: September 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nejeschleba, T. (2020). Francesco Piccolomini's Platonism and Nicolas of Cusa in the "Peripatetic Exercise" of Johannes Jessenius On Divine and Human Philosophy. Aither12(24), 216-230. doi: 10.5507/aither.2020.012
Download citation

References

  1. Baldini, A. E. (1980). "Per la biografia di Francesco Piccolomini". Rinascimento 20, pp. 389-420.
  2. Claessens, G. (2012). "Francesco Piccolomini on Prime Matter and Extension". Vivarium 50(2), pp. 225-44. Go to original source...
  3. Claessens, G. (2014). "A Sixteenth-Century Neoplatonic Synthesis: Francesco Piccolomini's theory of Mathematics and Imagination in the Academicae Contemplationes". The British Journal for the History of Science 47(3), pp. 421-31. Go to original source...
  4. Cusa, Nicolas de. (1932). De docta ignorantia (eds. E. Hoffmann, & R. Klibansky). Heidelberger Ausgabe der Opera omnia. Vol. I. Lipsiae: Felix Meiner.
  5. Cusa, Nicolas de. (1988). De Beryllo (eds. H. G. Senger, & K. Bormann). Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia. Vol. XI/1. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
  6. Flasch, K. (2001). Nicolaus Cusanus. München: C. H. Beck.
  7. Flasch, K. (2002). "Cusano e gli intellettuali italiani del quattrocento". In: C. Vasoli, & C. Pissavino (eds.), Le filosofie del rinascimento, Milano: Bruno Mondadori, pp. 175-192.
  8. Floss, P. (2020). The Philosophy of Nicholas of Cusa. An Introduction into His Thinking. Basel: Schwabe. Go to original source...
  9. Garin, E. (2008). History of Italian Philosophy. Amsterdam / New York: Rodopi. Go to original source...
  10. Hopkins, J. (1985). Nicholas of Cusa On Learned Ignorance : A Translation and an Appraisal of De Docta Ignorantia. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: A.J. Benning Press.
  11. Jardine, N. (1997). "Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy". In: D. A. di Liscia & E. Kessler, & Ch. Methuen (eds.), Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature : The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 183-209.
  12. Jesenský, J. (2019). Proti tyranům (Pro vindiciis contra tyrannos). Ed. K. Šolcová. Praha: Academia.
  13. Jessenius, Johannes. (1591a). De divina humanaque philosophia progymnasma peripateticum. Ad Divum Rudolphum II. Rom. Imperatorem, Ungariae et Boemiae Regem, Archiducem Austriae Etc. Venetiis: Apud Joachinum Bruinolum.
  14. Jessenius, Johannes. (1591b). De putrescentis bilis in febre tertiana exquisita intermittente loco. Disputatio ad inclytum Vratisiaviensem senatum. Disputabitur publice Patavii in Templo S. Francisci. Die 8. Augusti hora 20. Patavii: Apud Petrum Marinellum.
  15. Jessenius, Johannes. (1593). Zoroaster. Nova, brevis veraque de universo philosophia. Wittebergae: Crato.
  16. Jessenius, Johannes. (1600). Et philosophiae et medicinae solidae studiosis. Witebergae: Typis M. Iohannis Cratonis.
  17. Jessenius, Johannes. (1605). De anima et corpore universi, AKROASIS PERIPATETIKE. Pragae: Typis Haeredum M. Danielis Adami a Veleslavina.
  18. Kessler, E. (2007). "Intellective Soul". In: C. B. Schmitt, Q. Skinner & E. Kessler, & J. Kraye (Eds.), The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 485-534.
  19. Král, J. (1923). "Jessenius filozof". Česká mysl 19, pp. 129-41, 211-22.
  20. Kraye, J. (2002). "Eclectic Aristotelianism in the Moral Philosophy of Francesco Piccolomini". In: G. Piaia (ed.), La presenza dell'aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, Roma - Padova: Antenore, pp. 57-82.
  21. Lines, D. A. (2002). Aristotle's Ethics in the Italian Renaissance (ca. 1300-1650): the universities and the problem of moral education. Leiden: Brill. Go to original source...
  22. Lines, D. A. (2015a). "Latin and Vernacular in Francesco Piccolomini's moral philosophy" In: D. A. Lines, & E. Refini (eds.), Aristotele fatto volgare": Tradizione aristotelica e cultura volgare nel Rinascimento, Pisa: ETS, pp. 169-199.
  23. Lines, D. A. (2015b). "Piccolomini, Francesco". In: M. Sgarbi (ed.), Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, Cham: Springer. Go to original source...
  24. Nejeschleba, T. (2007). "Johannes Jessenius's Conception of Method". Acta Comeniana 20-21(44-45), pp. 9-23.
  25. Nejeschleba, T. (2008). Jan Jessenius v kontextu renesanční filosofie. Praha: Vyšehrad.
  26. Nejeschleba, T. (2014). "Johannes Jessenius, Between Plagiarism and an Adequate Understanding of Patrizi's Philosophy". In: P. R. Blum, & T. Nejeschleba (eds.), Francesco Patrizi. Philosopher of the Renaissance, Olomouc: UP Olomouc, pp. 359-69.
  27. Nejeschleba, T. (2019). "Il rinascimento veneziano nell'Europa centrale: Aristotelismo e Platonismo nell'opera di Johannes Jessenius (1566-1621), laureato dell'Università di Padova". In: R. Bassi (ed.), Rinascimento veneto e rinascimento europeo / European and Venetian Renaissance, Pisa: Edizioni ETS, pp. 183-94.
  28. Pick, F. (1926). Johannes Jessenius de Magna Jessen. Arzt und Rektor in Wittenberg und Prag hingerichtet am 21. Juni 1621. Ein Lebensbild aus der Zeit des Dreissigjährigen Krieges. Leipzig: Barth.
  29. Plastina, S. (2002). "Concordia Discors: Aristotelismus und Platonismus in der Philosophie des Francesco Piccolomini". In: M. Mulsow (ed.), Das Ende des Hermetismus, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 211-34.
  30. Savonarola, H. (1596). Universae Philosophiae Epitome. Wittebergae: typis Simonis Grenenbergii.
  31. Schmitt, C. B. (1983). Aristotle and the Renaissance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
  32. Šolcová, K. (2015). "Johannes Jessenius's Pro vindiciis contra tyrannos oratio and the Reception of Monarchomachy in the Bohemian Lands". Acta Comeniana 29(53), pp. 137-68.
  33. Spruit, L. (1995). Species Intelligibilis: From Perception to Knowledge. Volume Two. Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of Intelligible Species in Modern Philosophy. Leiden / New York: Brill. Go to original source...
  34. Várossová, E. (1987). "Prírodná filozofia Jána Jessenia". In: J. Bodnár (ed.), Dejiny filozofického myslenia na Slovensku I, Bratislava: Veda.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.