Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 5/2011:175-221 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2011.008

Otázka a kontext problematiky sufficientia praedicamentorum u Jeronýma Pražského a Robert Alyngton jako oxfordský zdroj jeho odpovědi

Ota Pavlíček

Published: March 30, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavlíček, O. (2011). Otázka a kontext problematiky sufficientia praedicamentorum u Jeronýma Pražského a Robert Alyngton jako oxfordský zdroj jeho odpovědi. Aither, 3(5), 175-221. doi: 10.5507/aither.2011.008
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anonym (Hieronymus de Praga), Collecta de probationibus prospositionum, rukopis Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, VIII F 16.
    2. Anonymi fragmentum vulgo vocatum Liber Sex Principiorum (Aristoteles Latinus I:6-7), Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.), 1966, Bruges-Paris, s. 35-59.
    3. Anselmus Cantuariensis, 1946, S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archepiscopi opera omnia, vol. 2, Schmitt, S. F. (ed.), Edinburgh.
    4. Aristoteles, 1958, Kategorie, Kříž, A. (přel.), Praha.
    5. Aristoteles, 1963, Categories and De Interpretatione, Ackrill, J. L. (přel.), Oxford. Go to original source...
    6. Guillelmus de Ockham, 1980, Quodlibeta septem, Wey, J. C. (ed.), St. Bonaventure, NY.
    7. Hieronymus de Praga, 2011, Quaestiones, Polemica, Epistulae, Šmahel, F., Silagi, G. (edd.), Turnhout.
    8. Johannes Wyclif, 1869, Trialogus, Lechler, G. (ed.), Oxford.
    9. Klicman, L. (ed.), 1898, Processus iudicarius contra Jeronimum de Praga habitus Viennae a. 1410-1412, Praha.
    10. Liber decanorum facultatis philosophicae universitatis Pragensis (Monumenta Historica Universitatis Carolo-Ferdinandeae Pragensis I/1), 1830, Praha.
    11. Robertus Alyngton, Litteralis sentencia super Praedicamenta Aristotelis, Conti, A. (ed.), Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale VI, s. 242-306.
    12. Robertus Alyngton, Expositio libri "Praedicamentorum" Aristotelis (Litteralis sentencia super Praedicamenta Aristotelis), rukopis Praha NK V B 11, fol. 1r-105r.
    13. Porfyrios, 1970, Úvod k Aristotelovým Kategoriím, Mráz, M. (přeložil, úvodem a poznámkami opatřil), Filosofický časopis XVIII, 6, s. 971-978.
    14. Simplicius, 1907, In Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium, Kalbfleisch, C. (ed.), Berolini.
    15. Simplicius, 1971, Commentaire sur les Categories d'Aristote : Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, sv. I, Pattin, A. (ed.), Louvain-Leiden.
    16. Simplicius, 1975, Commentaire sur les Categories d'Aristote : Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke, sv. II, Pattin, A. (ed.), Louvain-Leiden.
    17. Simplicius, 1990a, Commentaire sur les Catégories : Introduction, première partie, Hoffmann, P. (přeložil), Hadot, I. (opatřila komentářem), Hadot, P., Mahé, J.-P. (opatřili přílohami), Leiden-New York-København-Köln.
    18. Simplicius, 1990b, Commentaire sur les Catégories : Commentaire au premier chapitre des Catégories, Hoffman, P. (přeložil do francouzského jazyka), Concetta, L. (opatřila úvodem, komentářem a poznámkami), Leiden-New York-København-Köln.
    19. Simplicius, 2001, Commentaire sur les Catégories d'Aristote: Chapitres 2-4, Hoffmann, P. (přeložil), Luna, C. (opatřila komentářem), Paris.
    20. Thomas Maulevelt, 2008, Quaestiones super veteri arte ff. 1ra-145vb, quaestiones super praedicamenta Erfurt SB Ampl. Q 288 (XIV) ff. 43rb-145vb, Quaestio 16, Andrews, R. (ed.), in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 358-368. Go to original source...
    21. Andrews, R., 2001, "Question commentaries on the Categories in the Thirteenth century", Medioevo. Rivista di Storia della filosofia Medievale 26, s. 265-326.
    22. Andrews, R., 2008, "Thomas Maulevelt's Denial of Substance", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 347-357. Go to original source...
    23. Baltussen, H., 2008, Philosophy and Exegesis in Simplicius: The Methodology of a Commentator, London.
    24. Biard, J., Rosier-Catach, I. (edd.), 2003, La tradition médiévale des Catégories (XIIe-XVe siècles), Louvain.
    25. Bos, E. P., 2000, "Nature and Number of the categories and the Division of Being According to Domingo Soto (1495-1560)", in: Angelelli, I., Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. (edd.), Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, s. 327-353.
    26. Bruun, O., Corti, L. (edd.), 2005, Les Catégories et leur histoire, Paris.
    27. Cesalli, L., 2001, "Le réalisme propositionnel de Walter Burley", Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen-âge 68, s. 155-221. Go to original source...
    28. Cesalli, L., 2005, "Le 'pan-propositionnalisme' de Jean Wyclif", Vivarium 43.1, s. 124-155. Go to original source...
    29. Cesalli, L., 2007, Le réalisme propositionnel, Paris.
    30. Chase, M., 2008, "The Medieval Posterity of Simplicius' Commentary on the Categories: Thomas Aquinas and al-Fārābī", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 10-29. Go to original source...
    31. Conti, A. D., 1990, Johannes Sharpe: Quaestio super universalia, Firenze.
    32. Conti, A. D., 1993, "Linguago e realtà nel commento alle Categorie di Robert Alyngton", Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale VI, s. 179-306.
    33. Conti, A. D., 1997, "Analogy and Formal Distinction: on the Logical Basis of Wyclif's Metaphysics," Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6.2, s. 133-65. Go to original source...
    34. Conti, A. D., 2005, "Johannes Sharpe's Ontology and Semantics: Oxford Realism Revisited", Vivarium 43.1, s. 156-186. Go to original source...
    35. Conti, A. D., 2006, "Wyclif's Logic and Metaphysics", in: Levy, I. Ch. (ed.), A Companion to John Wyclif, Leiden - Boston, s. 67-125. Go to original source...
    36. Conti, A. D., 2008a, "A Realist Interpretation of the Categories in the Fourteenth Century: The Litteralis Sententia Super Praedicamenta Aristotelis of Robert Alyngton", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 317-346. Go to original source...
    37. Conti, A. D., 2008b, "Categories and Universals in the Later Middle Ages", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 369-409. Go to original source...
    38. Conti, A. D., 2008-2009, "Ockham and Burley on Categories and Universals: a Comparison", The Modern Schoolman, LXXXVI, November 2008 / January 2009, s. 181-210. Go to original source...
    39. Ebbesen, S., 1998, "The Paris arts faculty: Siger of Brabant, Boethius of Dacia, Radulphus Brito", in: Marenbon, J. (ed.), Medieval Philosophy (Routledge History of Philosophy, Volume III), London, s. 269-290 (odkazuji na paperback vydaný v roce 2003).
    40. Gracia, J. J. E., 1999, Metaphysics and its Task: The Search for the Categorial Foundation of Knowledge, Albany, N.Y.
    41. Hadot, I., 1987, Simplicius: Sa vie, son oeuvre, sa survie, Berlin-New York. Go to original source...
    42. Hall, A. W., 2008, "John Buridan: On Aristotle's Categories", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 295-316. Go to original source...
    43. Herold, V., 1985, Pražská univerzita a Wyclif: Wyclifovo učení o ideách a gene husitského revolučního hnutí, Praha.
    44. Herold, V., 1989, "Magister Hieronymus von Prag und die Universität Köln", in: Zimmermann, A., Die Kölner Universität im Mittelalter (Miscellanea Mediaevalia 20), Berlin, s. 255-273.
    45. Newton, L. A. (ed.), 2008, Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln. Go to original source...
    46. Kaluza, Z., 1994, "Jérôme de Prague et le Timée de Platon", Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen-âge 61, s. 57-104.
    47. Kaluza, Z., 1997, "La question de Jérôme de Prague disputée à Heidelberg", in: Libera, A. de, Elamrani-Jamal, A., Galonnier, A. (edd.), Langages et Philosophie: Hommage à Jean Jolivet, Paris, s. 123-152.
    48. Klima, G., 1999a, "Ockham's Semantics and Ontology of the Categories", in: Spade, P. V. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham, Cambridge, s. 118-142. Go to original source...
    49. Klima, G., 1999b, "Buridan's logic and the ontology of modes", in: Ebbesen, S. (ed.), Medieval Analyses in Language and Cognition, Copenhagen, s. 473-495.
    50. Klima, G., 2002, "John Buridan", in: Gracia, J. J. E., Noone, T. B. (edd.), A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, London, s. 340-348. Go to original source...
    51. Libera, A. de, 1996, La querelle des universaux; De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age, Paris.
    52. Lohr, Ch., 1967, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-F", Traditio 23, s. 313-413. Go to original source...
    53. Lohr, Ch., 1968, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors G-I", Traditio 24, s. 149-245. Go to original source...
    54. Lohr, Ch., 1970, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Jacobus-Johannes Juff", Traditio 26, s. 135-216. Go to original source...
    55. Lohr, Ch., 1971, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Johannes de Kanthi-Myngodus", Traditio 27, s. 251-351. Go to original source...
    56. Lohr, Ch., 1972, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Narcissus-Richardus", Traditio 28, s. 281-396. Go to original source...
    57. Lohr, Ch., 1973, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Robertus-Wilgelmus", Traditio 29, s. 93-197. Go to original source...
    58. Lohr, Ch., 1974, "Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Supplementary Authors", Traditio 30, s. 119-144. Go to original source...
    59. Lorenz, S., 1996, "Thomas Manlefelt (Maulefelt), Zu Leben und Werk", in: Kintzinger, M., Lorenz, S., Walter, M. (edd.), Schule und Schüler im Mittelalter. Beiträge zur europäischen Bildungsgeschichte des 9. Bis 15. Jahrhunderts, Köln, s. 145-164.
    60. McMahon, W. E., 1981, "Radulphus Brito on The Sufficiency of The Categories", Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 39, s. 81-96.
    61. McMahon, W. E., 2000, "The Categories in Some Post-Medieval Spanish Philosophers", in: Angelelli, I., Pérez-Ilzarbe, P. (edd.), Medieval and Renaissance Logic in Spain, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, s. 355-370.
    62. McMahon, W. E., 2002, "The Medieval Sufficientiae: Attempts at a Definitive Division of the Categories", in: Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, vol. 2, New York, s. 12-25.
    63. McMahon, W. E., 2003, "Some Non-Standard Views of The Categories", in: Biard, J., Rosier-Catach, I. (edd.), La tradition médiévale des Catégories (XIIe-XVe siècles), Louvain, s. 53-67.
    64. Nodl, M., 2000, "Paměť a intelektuál", in: Kroupa, J.K. (ed.), Septuaginta Paulo Spunar oblata (70+2), Praha, s. 376-384.
    65. Pavlíček, O., 2011, "Two Philosophical Texts of Jerome of Prague and his Alleged Designation of Opponents of Real Universals as Diabolical Heretics", in: David, Z. V., Holeton, D. R. (edd.), The Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice 8, Prague (v tisku).
    66. Perger, M. von, 2003, "Understanding the Categories by Divisions: Walter of Burley vs. William Ockham", in: Biard, J., Rosier-Catach, I. (edd.), La tradition médiévale des Catégories (XIIe-XVe siècles), Louvain, s. 37-52.
    67. Pini, G., 2003, "Scotus on Deducing Aristotle's Categories", in: Biard, J., Rosier-Catach, I. (edd.), La tradition médiévale des Catégories (XIIe-XVe siècles), Louvain, s. 23-35.
    68. Pini, G., 2008, "Reading Aristotle's Categories as an Introduction to Logic: Later Medieval Discussions about Its Place in the Aristotelian corpus", in: Newton, L. A. (ed.), Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Categories, Leiden-New York-København-Köln, s. 145-182. Go to original source...
    69. Spunar, P., 1978, "Literární činnost utrakvistů doby poděbradské a jagellonské", in Molnár, A. (ed.), Příspěvky k dějinám utrakvismu, Praha, s. 165-269.
    70. Šmahel, F., 1978, "Prolegomena zum Prager Universalienstreit: Zwischenbilanz einer Quellenanalyse", in: Ijsewijnm J., Paquet, J. (edd.), The Universities in the Middle Ages, Leuven, s. 242-255.
    71. Šmahel, F., 1979, Husitská "Collecta de probationibus propositionum" v rukopise SK ČSR VIII F 16, in: Pokorný, P. R. (ed.), Pocta dr. Emmě Urbánkové, Praha, s. 365-389.
    72. Šmahel, F., 1980, Verzeichnis der Quellen zum Prager Universalienstreit 1348-1500 (Mediaevalia Philosophica Polonorum XXV), Wroclav-Warszawa-Kraków-Gdansk.
    73. Šmahel, F., 2007a, "Prolegomena zum Prager Universalienstreit: Zwischenbilanz einer Quellenanalyse", in: Šmahel, F. (ed.), Die Prager Universität im Mittelalter. Gesammelte Aufsätze / The Charles University in the Middle Ages. Selected Studies, Leiden - Boston, s. 490-503. Go to original source...
    74. Šmahel, F., 2007b, "Mag. Hieronymus von Prag und die heidelberger Universität", in: Šmahel, F. (ed.), Die Prager Universität im Mittelalter. Gesammelte Aufsätze / The Charles University in the Middle Ages. Selected Studies, Leiden - Boston, s. 526-538. Go to original source...
    75. Šmahel, F., 2007c, "Jerome Of Prague: University Questiones And Polemics", in: Šmahel, F. (ed.), Die Prager Universität im Mittelalter. Gesammelte Aufsätze / The Charles University in the Middle Ages. Selected Studies, Leiden - Boston, s. 539-580. Go to original source...
    76. Šmahel, F., 2007d, "Eine Hussitische Collecta De Probationibus Propositionum", in: Šmahel, F. (ed.), Die Prager Universität im Mittelalter. Gesammelte Aufsätze / The Charles University in the Middle Ages. Selected Studies, Leiden - Boston, s. 581-598. Go to original source...
    77. Šmahel, F., 2010, Život a dílo Jeronýma Pražského: Zpráva o výzkumu, Praha.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content