Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 11/2014:100-113 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2014.010

Aristotle and New Rhethoric

Kryštof Boháček
Filosofický ústav AV ČR

The author starts with Plato's Gorgias and shows how important was this topic for Plato's constitution of theoretical philosophy and how serious was the alternative of rhetorical philosophy. The second part describes the decline of classical rhetoric from the Greek most influential intellectual discourse to the "zero point" around 1900. Third section is dedicated to Chaim Perelman and the "Rhetorical Turn" movement, which is, according to Perelman, treated as return to Aristotle. In the last part, the author confronts Aristotle's own position, as we interpret it today, with Perelman's understanding of Aristotelian rhetoric, and asks, if the New Rhetoric really returned to Aristotle? In the end it shows how the answer depends on the own philosophical position of the interpreter.

Published: March 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boháček, K. (2014). Aristotle and New Rhethoric. Aither6(11), 100-113. doi: 10.5507/aither.2014.010
Download citation

References

  1. Andersen, Q. (2001). Im Garten der Rhetorik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  2. Baumhauer, O. A. (1986). Die sophistische Rhetorik. Stuttgart: Metzler. Go to original source...
  3. Boháček, K. (2010). "Between Truth and Beauty. Symposium 194e - 201c". Aither. International Issue I, s. 173-195. Go to original source...
  4. Crowley, S., Hawhee, D. (1999). Ancient Rhetoric for Contemporary Students. Pennsylvania: Allyn & Bacon.
  5. Eucken, Ch. (1983). Isokrates: seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  6. Gerl, H.-B. (1989). "Rhetorik und Philosophie im Mittelalter". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 99-120.
  7. Grassi, E. (1989). "Rhetorischer Humanismus: Die Liebe zum Wort, Philologie". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 159-168.
  8. Halliwell, S. (1994). "Philosophy and Rhetoric". In: I. Worthington (ed.), Persuation: Greek Rhetoric in Action, London: Routledge, s. 222-243.
  9. Kraus, J. (1998). Rétorika v evropské kultuře. Praha: Academia.
  10. Kraus, J. (2004). Rétorika a řečová kultura. Praha: Karolinum.
  11. Magaß, W. (1989). "Rhetorik und Philosophie in der Patristik". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 75-98.
  12. Marshall, D. L. (2010). Vico and the Transformation of Rhetoric in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  13. Perelman, Ch. (2004). Die neue Rhetorik. Bd. 1, Bd. 2. Stuttgart: Frommann, Holzboog.
  14. Pöggler, O. (1989). "Gadamers philosophische Hermeneutik und Rhetorik". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 201-216.
  15. Siegert, F. (1989). "Rhetorik und Philosophie in der 'Neuen Rhetorik' Chaim Perelmans". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 217-228.
  16. Varwig, F. R. (1989). "Jacobus Facciolatus (1682-1769) - Ein Protagonist der neuhumanistischen Schulrede über Rhetorik und Philosophie". In: H. Schanze, J. Kopperschmidt (eds.), Rhetorik und Philosophie, München: Wilhelm Fink, s. 169-190.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.