Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 12/2014 (International issue no. 3):32-53 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2014.017

Reading Aquinas in the Renaissance: Dominic of Flanders on the Imagination and Phantasm

Brian Garcia
Hoger Instituut voor Wijsbegeerte, KU Leuven

This paper takes up the 15th century thinker, Dominic of Flanders, as a reader of Thomas Aquinas and indeed a representative of Renaissance Thomism. The topic at hand is Dominic's presentation of phantasia, or imagination, and the phantasma. The phantasm, of course, plays a prominent role in the Aristotelian model of intellectual cognition, yet seems to remain a somewhat vague concept. We will show some of Dominic's peculiar characterizations of the phantasm. In the background of our analysis is a broader reflection concerning methodology. It is suggested that in order to judge better Dominic as a reader of Thomas, a static understanding of the latter must be avoided, and rather that his doctrine be problematized. By drawing attention to certain ambiguities in Thomas' characterizations of the phantasm and the role of the imagination, we can better situate Dominic's interpretation.

Published: September 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Garcia, B. (2014). Reading Aquinas in the Renaissance: Dominic of Flanders on the Imagination and Phantasm. Aither6(12), 32-53. doi: 10.5507/aither.2014.017
Download citation

References

  1. Aquinas, T. (1889). Opera omnia, vol. 5: Pars Prima Summae Theologiae, a quaestione L ad quaestionem CXIX. Roma: Typographia Polyglotta.
  2. Aquinas, T. (1959). In Aristotelis Librum de Anima Commentarium (ed. A. M. Pirotta). Torino: Marietti.
  3. Aquinas, T. (1984). Opera omnia, vol. 45,1: Sententia libri de Anima. Roma; Paris: Commissio Leonina.
  4. Fabro, C. (1938). "Knowledge and Perception in Aristotelic-Thomistic Psychology". New Scholasticism, 12, pp. 337-365. Go to original source...
  5. Ficino, M. (2005). Platonic Theology, v. 5: Books 15-16 (ed. J. Hankins, W. Bowen; trans. M. J. B. Allen). Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.
  6. Flandria, D. de, (1550). Divi Thomae Aquinatis in tres libros de Anima [hellip] Accedunt adhaec acustissime Quaestiones Magistri Dominici de Flandria [hellip]. Venetiis: Hieronymum Scotum.
  7. Flandria, D. de, (1621). In duodecim libros Metaphysicae Aristotelis, secundum expositionem [hellip] Angelici Doctoris, lucidissimae atque utilissimae Quaestiones. Köln [reprint: Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms Verlag, 2010. Préface de Jean École, Leinen Series: Christian Wolff Gesammelte Werke, III. Abt.: Materialien und Dokumente, Bd. 120].
  8. Frede, D. (2001). "Aquinas on Phantasia". In: D. Perler (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill, pp. 155-184. Go to original source...
  9. Kaeppeli, T. (1970). Scriptores Praedicatorum Medii Aevi, Vol. 1. Roma: S. Sabina.
  10. Kretzmann, N. (1993). "Philosophy of Mind". In: N. Kreztmann, E. Stump (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge University Press, pp. 128-159. Go to original source...
  11. Lonergan, B. (1992). Insight: A Study of Human Understanding (ed. F. E. Crowe, R. M. Doran). Toronto: University of Toronto Press [originally published by Longmans, Green, London 1957].
  12. Lonergan, B. (1997). Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press [originally published as a series of articles in Theological Studies, 1946-1949].
  13. Pomponazzi, P. (1948). On the Immortality of the Soul. In: E. Cassirer et al. (eds.), The Renaissance Philosophy. London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 280-381.
  14. Suárez, F. (1861). Opera Omnia tomus tertius [hellip] Tractatus tertius de Anima. Paris: Vives.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.