Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 17/2017:48-73 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2017.003

Analogia entis in the Nominalist Tradition. Marginal Notes on Fourteenth-Century Semantics

Miroslav Hanke
Filosofický ústav Akademie věd ČR, v.v.i.

The problem of the analogy of being is at an intersection of ontology and semantics. It can be motivated by the following aporia: the assumptions that "being" is meaningful and transcendental and that every super-ordinate concept decomposes into specific concepts by means of specific differences are inconsistent. The solution is to reconsider the semantics of "being" or the theory of the generality of concepts. Since the thirteenth century, the former was associated with the view that the concept of being is transcendental but (systematically) ambiguous, while the latter with the view that the concept of being is transcendental and unambiguous but does not decompose into sub-ordinate concepts in the same way as generic concepts decompose into specific ones. One of the achievements of fourteenth- century nominalism was an emphasis on semantics, which made it possible to re-formulate the analogy of being in rigorous logico-semantic terms. Second, the combination of Eucharistic ontology and a weak ontology of accidental beings led to a re-statement of the problem in a bottom-up fashion and to its re-construction into a theorem of the semantics and ontology of accidents.

Published: March 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hanke, M. (2017). Analogia entis in the Nominalist Tradition. Marginal Notes on Fourteenth-Century Semantics. Aither9(17), 48-73. doi: 10.5507/aither.2017.003
Download citation

References

  1. Aertsen, J. (2012). Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez. Leiden: Brill. Go to original source...
  2. Albert ze Saska (1988). Quaestiones in artem veterem (ed. A. M. García). Maracaibo: Universidad del Zulia.
  3. Albert ze Saska (2010). Logik (přel. H. Berger). Hamburg: Meiner. Go to original source...
  4. Aristotelés (1985). The Complete Works of Aristotle, Volume II (ed. J. Barnes, přel. W. D. Ross). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  5. Aristoteles Latinus (1995). "Metaphysica (recensio et translatio Guillelmi de Moerbeka)". In: G. Vuillemin-Diem (ed.), Aristoteles Latinus XXV 3.2. Leiden: Brill.
  6. Aristotelés (2008). Metafyzika (přel. A. Kříž). Praha: Petr Rezek.
  7. Ashworth, E. J. (2013). "Medieval Theories of Analogy". In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition). URL =.
  8. Bakker, P. J. J. M. (2000). "Aristotelian Metaphysics and Eucharistic Theology. John Buridan and Marsilius of Inghen on the Ontological Status of Accidental Being." In: J. M. M. H. Thijssen, J. Zupko (eds.), The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden: Brill, s. 247-264.
  9. Bakker, P. J. J. M. (2002). "Inhérence, univocité et séparabilité des accidents eucharistiques". In: J.-L. Solère, Z. Kaluza (eds.), La servante et la consolatrice. La philosophie dans des rapports avec la théologie au Moyen Âge (Textes et Traditions 3). Paris: Vrin, s. 193-245.
  10. Buridan, J. (1995). Johannes Buridanus: Summulae de suppositionibus (ed. R. van der Lecq). Turnhout: Brepols.
  11. Buridan, J. (2002). "Quaestiones in Metaphysicam (secundum ultimam lecturam), Liber IV, quaestio 6". In: J.-L. Solère, Z. Kaluza (eds.), La servante et la consolatrice. La philosophie dans des rapports avec la théologie au Moyen Âge (Textes et Traditions 3). Paris: Vrin, s. 219-232.
  12. Buridan, J. (2008). Lectura Erfordiensis in I-VI Metaphysicam, together with the 15th-century Abbreviatio Caminensis: Introduction, Critical Edition and Indexes (ed. L. M. de Rijk). Turnhout: Brepols. Go to original source...
  13. Courtenay, W. J. (2004). "The University of Paris at the Time of Jean Buridan and Nicole Oresme". Vivarium 42, s. 3-17. Go to original source...
  14. Courtenay, W. J. (2008). Ockham and Ockhamism. Studies in the Dissemination and Impact of his Thought. Leiden: Brill. Go to original source...
  15. Jan Duns Scotus (1895). "Quaestiones quodlibetales". In: Joannis Duns Scoti doctoris subtilis, ordinis minorum Opera omnia tom. 25. Paris.
  16. Jan Duns Scotus (1954). Ordinatio. Liber primus, distinctio tertia. Opera omnia III (eds. C. Balic, M. Bodewig, S. Buselic, P. Capkun-Delic, B. Hechich, I. Juric, B. Korosak, L. Modric, I. Montalverne, S. Nanni, B. Pergamo, F. Prezioso, I. Reinhold, O. Schäfer). Città del Vaticano: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.
  17. Dvořák, P. (ed.) (2007a). Analogie ve filosofii a teologii. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  18. Dvořák, P. (2007b). "Sémantika analogie u Tomáše a v tomismu". In: P. Dvořák, Analogie ve filosofii a teologii. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, s. 91-106.
  19. Dvořák, P. (2007c). Tomáš a Kajetán o analogii jmen. Praha: Krystal OP.
  20. Hoenen, M. (2017). "Marsilius of Inghen". In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). URL =. Go to original source...
  21. Chabada, M. (2007). "K niektorým argumentom v prospěch jednoznačnosti pojmu súcna u Jána Dunsa Scota". In: P. Dvořák (ed.), Analogie ve filosofii a teologii. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, s. 119-140.
  22. Jindřich z Ghentu (1981). "Quodlibet X". In: R. Macken (ed.), Henrici de Gandavo Opera Omnia 14. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
  23. Kirschner, S. (2013). "Nicole Oresme". In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). URL =.
  24. Kok, F. J. (2013). "John Buridan's Commentary on Metaphysics". In: G. Galluzzo, F. Amerini (eds.), A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill, s. 495-549. Go to original source...
  25. Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. J. P., Pinborg, J. (eds.) (1988). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: from the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Leinsle, U. G. (2002). "Rodrigo de Arriaga im Streit um modale Entitäten". In: J. Beneš, P. Glombíček, V. Urbánek (eds.), Bene Scripsisti: Filosofie od středověku k novověku. Sborník k sedmdesátinám Stanislava Sousedíka. Praha: Filosofia, s. 161-190.
  27. Marsilius of Inghen (2000). Quaestiones super quattuor libros Sententiarum, Vol. 2: Super primum, quaestiones 8-21 (eds. G. Wieland, M. Santos Noya, M. J. F. M. Hoenen, M. Schulze). Leiden: Brill.
  28. Marsilius z Inghen (2002). "Quaestiones in Metaphysicam, Liber IV, quaestio 5". In: J.-L. Solère, Z. Kaluza (eds.), La servante et la consolatrice. La philosophie dans des rapports avec la théologie au Moyen Âge (Textes et Traditions 3). Paris: Vrin, s. 233-245.
  29. Marsilius z Inghen (2008). Quaestiones super librum Praedicamentorum Aristotelis (ed. H. Wojtczak). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II.
  30. Marsilius z Inghen (2014). Quaestiones super Isagogen Porphyrii (ed. H. Wojtczak). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II.
  31. Marsilius of Inghen (2015). Quaestiones super quattuor libros Sententiarum, Vol. 3: Super primum, quaestiones 22-37 (eds. M. J. F. M. Hoenen, M. Erne). Leiden: Brill.
  32. Michael, B. (1985). Johannes Buridan: Studien zu seinem Leben, seinen Werken und zu Rezeption seiner Theorien im Europa des späten Mittelalters, 2 sv. dizertační práce (Freie Universität Berlin). Berlin.
  33. Novák, L. (2007). "Analogický pojem po Scotovi? Kritika tomistické teorie analogie". In: P. Dvořák (ed.), Analogie ve filosofii a teologii. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, s. 141-162.
  34. Novák, L. (2011). Scire Deum esse: Scotův důkaz Boží existence jako vrcholný výkon metafyziky jakožto aristotelské vědy. Praha: Kalich.
  35. Nuchelmans, G. (1973). Theoreis of the Proposition. Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
  36. Nuchelmans, G. (1980). Late-Scholastic and Humanist Theories of the Proposition. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy.
  37. Nuchelmans, G. (1988). "The Semantics of Propositions". In: N. Kretzmann, A. J. P. Kenny, J. Pinborg (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: from the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism, 1100-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 197-210. Go to original source...
  38. Mikuláš Oresme (2013). Questiones super Physicam (Books I-VII) (eds. S. Caroti, J. Celeyrette, S. Kirschner, E. Mazet). Leiden: Brill.
  39. Pasnau, R. (2012). Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Go to original source...
  40. Pavel z Benátek (1978). Logica magna: Part II, Fascicule 6: Tractatus de veritate et falsitate propositionis et tractatus de significato propositionis (ed. F. del Punta, přel. M. M. Adams). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Pelletier, J. (2013). William of Ockham on Metaphysics. The Science of Being and God. Leiden: Brill. Go to original source...
  42. Perler, D. (1990). Satztheorien. Texte zur Sprachphilosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie im 14. Jahrhundert. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  43. Perler, D. (1992). Der propositionale Wahrheitsbegriff im 14. Jahrhundert. Berlin: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
  44. Porphyrius (1998). Isagoge (přel. Boëthius, přel. a ed. A. de Libera, ed. A.-P. Segonds). Paris: Vrin.
  45. Read, S. (2015). "Medieval Theories: Properties of Terms". In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition). URL =.
  46. Sousedík, S. (1989). Jan Duns Scotus: doctor subtilis a jeho čeští žáci. Praha: Vyšehrad.
  47. Tomáš Akvinský 87 (1929). Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, tom. 1 (ed. P. Mandonnet). Paris: Lethielleux.
  48. Tomáš Akvinský (1961). Liber de veritate catholicae Fidei contra errores infidelium seu Summa contra Gentiles, tom. 2-3 (eds. P. Marc, C. Pera, P. Caramello). Roma: Marietti.
  49. Tomáš Akvinský (1965). Quaestiones disputatae, tom. 2: Quaestiones disputatae de potentia (ed. P. M. Pession). Roma.
  50. Tomáš Akvinský (2003). O pravdě. O mysli. Praha: Krystal.
  51. Weijers, O. (1994-2012). Le travail intellectuel à la Faculté des arts de Paris: textes et maîtres (c. 1200-1500), 9 sv. Turnhout: Brepols. Go to original source...
  52. Zupko, J. (2014). "John Buridan". In: E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). URL =.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.