Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 20/2018 (International issue no. 5):4-19 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2018.005

The Muses and Reflexive Nature of the World in Archaic Greek Thought

Eliška Fulínová
Center for Theoretical Study, Charles University - Czech Academy of Sciences
Department of Philosophy and History of Science, Charles University, Faculty of Science

In Greek mythology, the Muses are not just inspiring agents of poetical creation, but their role is first of all a cosmological one: their birth crowns the process of cosmogony, bringing the world into the manifestation. As we try to demonstrate primarily in the course of Hesiod's Theogony, the song of the Muses celebrates and thus manifests the cosmos or the world-order through its articulation by means of the musical speech. As the world enters a new domain of appearance, new cosmological categories emerge. The first one being the beauty of the cosmos: as a world-order as well as the ordered whole, it can now manifest itself as beautiful. The second one being the possibility of fiction, of a delusive appearance: the complex reality can manifest itself in many incompatible ways, partial and thus potentially misleading. The third one being the reflexivity of the cosmos, founded on the reflexivity of the musical speech itself. The Muses are capable to manifest themselves, and even their own manifestation. By means of their song, the world becomes manifest to itself, too, and the complex system of divine powers gains a reflexive character. In the closing section, we sketch briefly what happens to this reflexivity in the domain of humans. Indeed, the mortals can gain immortality through the song of the Muses, expressed by inspired poets in human voice.

Published: September 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fulínová, E. (2018). The Muses and Reflexive Nature of the World in Archaic Greek Thought. Aither, 10(20), 4-19. doi: 10.5507/aither.2018.005
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Behr, C. A. (ed.) (1978). Aelius Aristides, Opera quae existant omnia, II. Leiden: Brill.
    2. Behr, C. A. (1986). Publius Aelius Aristides, The Complete Works: Orationes I-XVI (trans. by C. A. Behr). Leiden: Brill.
    3. Bonnafé, A. (1984). Poésie, nature et sacré, I: Homère, Hésiode et le sentiment grec de la nature, Lyon: Maison de l'Orient.
    4. Burnet, J. (ed.) (1991-1992). Platonis Opera, I-V. Oxford; New York; Toronto: Clarendon Press.
    5. Caldwell R. (transl.) (2015). Hesiod, Theogony & Works and Days, Indianapolis.
    6. Chadwick, H. M., Chadwick, N. K. (1940). The Growth of Literature, III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    7. Clay, J. S. (1988). "What the Muses sang: Theogony 1-115". Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 29, pp. 323-333.
    8. Détienne, M. (1979). Les maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque. Paris: F. Maspero.
    9. Diels, H. - Kranz, W. (eds.) (1996). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: griechisch und deutsch. Zürich: Weidmann.
    10. Dodds, E. R. (1951). The Greeks and the Irrational. Los Angeles. Go to original source...
    11. Fischerová, S. (2006a). "Devět lhoucích Múz". In: S. Fischerová, J. Starý (eds.), Původ poezie: Proměny poetické inspirace v evropských a mimoevropských kulturách, Praha: Argo, pp. 49-85.
    12. Fischerová, S. (2006b). "Kosmos mých slov: Srovnání Hésiodovy 'Theogonie' a Parmenidovy básně 'O přírodě'". Filosofický časopis 54, pp. 331-361.
    13. Griffith, M. (1983). "Personality in Hesiod". Classical Antiquity 2, pp. 37-65. Go to original source...
    14. Janko, R. (1981). "The Structure of the Homeric Hymns: A Study in Genre". Hermes 109, pp. 9-24.
    15. Kahn, C. (1994). Anaximander and The Origins of Greek Cosmology, Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett.
    16. Long, H. S. (ed.) (1964). Diogenis Laertii vitae philosophorum, I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    17. Luhanová, E. (2014). "Múzy a počátky reflexivity v archaickém řeckém myšlení". Listy filologické 137(3-4), pp. 245-273.
    18. Maehler, H. (ed.) (1975). Pindari Carmina cum fragmentis, Leipzig: Teubner.
    19. Miller, A. M. (1986). From Delos to Delphi: A Literary Study of the Homeric Hymn to Apollo, Leiden: Brill.
    20. Mühll, P. von der (ed.) (1993). Homeri Odyssea. Munich; Leipzig: Teubner. Go to original source...
    21. Nancy, J.-L. (1982). Le Partage des voix. Paris: Galilée.
    22. Otto, W. F. (1955). Die Musen und der Göttliche Ursprung des Singens und Sagens. Düsseldorf: E. Diederich.
    23. Otto, W. F. (1987). Essais sur le mythe. Mauvezin: Trans-Europ-Repress.
    24. Page, D. L. (ed.) (1962). Poetae Melici Graeci. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    25. Pucci, P. (1977). Hesiod and the Language of Poetry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    26. Race, W. (1997). Pindar, Nemean Odes, Isthmian Odes, Fragments (ed., trans. by W. Race). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    27. Scodel, R. (2001). "Poetic Authority and Oral Tradition in Hesiod and Pindar". In: J. Watson (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill. Go to original source...
    28. Šedina, M. (1995). "Krásná Gorgona". In: L. Karfíková, A. Matoušek (eds.), Posvátný obraz a zobrazení posvátného, Praha: Česká křesťanská akademie, pp. 13-38.
    29. Šedina, M. (1997). Sparagmos. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
    30. Sedley, D. (2010). "Hesiod's 'Theogony' and Plato's 'Timaeus'". In: G. Boys-Stones, J. Haubold (eds.), Plato and Hesiod, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    31. Vandvik E. (1943). The Prometheus of Hesiod and Aeschylus (Skrifter utgitt av det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo, II. Hist.-Filos. Klasse, 1942, No. 2), Oslo: Dybwad.
    32. Vernant, J.-P. (1989). L'individu, la mort, l'amour: Soi-même et l'autre en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Gallimard.
    33. Versnel, H. S. (1981). "Religious Mentality in Ancient Prayer". In: H. S. Versnel (ed.), Faith, Hope and Worship: Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World, Leiden: Brill, pp. 1-64. Go to original source...
    34. Wendland, P. (ed.) (1897). Philonis Alexandrini Opera quae supersunt, II. Berlin: De Gruyter. Go to original source...
    35. West, M. L. (ed.) (1966). Hesiod, Theogony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    36. West, M. L. (ed.) (1978). Hesiod, Works and Days. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    37. West, M. L. (ed.) (1992). Iambi et Elegi Graeci, II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    38. West, M. L. (ed.) (1998-2000). Homeri Ilias, I-II. Munich; Leipzig: Saur.
    39. West, M. L. (ed. and transl.) (2003). Homeric hymns, Homeric apocrypha, Lives of Homer (ed., trans. by M. L. West). Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content