Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 29/2023:28-43 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2023.009

Stud jako sociální fundament v prótagorovském mýtu v Platónově dialogu Prótagoras

Veronika Konrádová
Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

The paper explores the ancient concept of shame (aidôs) as a social emotion responsible for the coherence of the human community. It examines this issue in a narrower context, using the specific example of Plato’s text. The core of the analysis is the myth of the origin of culture in Plato’s Protagoras (Prot. 320d–322d), which presents God as the giver of the basic principles of the community functioning, i.e. shame and justice (aidôs kai dikê). The broader context of the interpretation is contemporary theories of the human culture emergence, in particular a comparison with the Sisyphus, fragment DK 88 B 25. Especially, the comparison notes fundamental differences in the conception of the human sociality principles in the two texts and, on the basis of this comparison, concludes that the Protagorean myth in the eponymous dialogue differs in  important respects from the Sophistic positions articulated in DK 88 B 25. The proposed reading therefore challenges the assumption that the narrative in the Protagoras reproduces the doctrine of the historical Protagoras and instead defends the position that this rendering reflects Platonic positions. In support of this interpretation, the paper refers to other passages in the Platonic corpus and selects for specific comparison the positive evaluation of shame (aidôs, aischynê) with emphasis on its ethical-social dimension in the Book I of Plato’s Laws (Leg. 646e–647c).

Received: September 26, 2023; Revised: September 26, 2023; Accepted: November 7, 2023; Published: February 15, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Konrádová, V. (2023). Stud jako sociální fundament v prótagorovském mýtu v Platónově dialogu Prótagoras. Aither15(29), 28-43. doi: 10.5507/aither.2023.009
Download citation

References

  1. Barney, Rachel. 2006. "The Sophistic Movement." In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, editovali Mary Louise Gill a Pierre Pellegrin. Oxford: Blackwell.
  2. Cairns, Douglas L. 1993. Aidôs. The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Dickie, Mathew W. 1978. "Dike as a Moral Term in Homer and Hesiod." Classical Philology 73 (2): 91-101. Go to original source...
  4. Ferrarin, Alfredo. 2000. "Homo Faber, Homo Sapiens, or Homo Politicus? Protagoras and the Myth of Prometheus." The Review of Metaphysics 54 (2): 289-319.
  5. Hésiodos. 1990. Zpěvy železného věku. Přeložila Julie Nováková. Praha: Svoboda.
  6. Kahn, Charles H. 1997. "Greek Religion and Philosophy in the Sisyphus Fragment." Phronesis 42: 247-267. Go to original source...
  7. Kahn, Charles H. 1981. The Origins of Social Contract Theory. In The Sophists and their Legacy, editoval George B. Kerferd, 92-108. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
  8. Konrádová, Veronika. 2018. "God and Justice in Hesiod and Plato: Interpreting the Myth of Protagoras (Prot. 320d-322d)." ΠΗΓΗ/FONS 3: 9-19. Go to original source...
  9. Konstan, David. 2003. "Shame in Ancient Greece." Social Research: An International Quarterly 70 (4): 1031-1060. Go to original source...
  10. Morgan, Kathryn A. 2000. Myth and Philosophy from the Presocratics to Plato, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  11. Riel, Gerd van. 2012. "Religion and Morality. Elements of Plato's Anthropology in the Myth of Prometheus (Protagoras, 320d-322d)". In Plato and Myth. Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths, editovali Catherine Collobert, Pierre Destrée a Francisco J. Gonzalez, 145-164. Leiden - Boston: Brill. Go to original source...
  12. Pfefferkorn, Julia. 2020. "Shame and Virtue in Plato's Laws: Two Kinds of Fear and the Drunken Puppet." In Emotions in Plato, editovali Laura Candiotto a Olivier Renaut, 252-269. Leiden - Boston: Brill. Go to original source...
  13. Platón. 1992. Gorgias. Přeložil František Novotný. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  14. Platón. 1994. Politikos. Přeložil František Novotný. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  15. Platón. 1992. Prótagoras. Přeložil František Novotný. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  16. Platón. 1996. Timaios. Kritias. Přeložil František Novotný. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  17. Platón. 1997. Zákony. Přeložil František Novotný. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  18. Rowe, Christopher, and Malcolm Schofield, eds. 2007. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Salis, John. 1999. Chorology. On Beginning in Plato's Timaeus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  20. Sprague, Rosamond K., ed. 2001. The Older Sophists. Indianapolis - Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
  21. Svoboda, Karel. 1962. Zlomky předsokratovských myslitelů. Vybral a přeložil Karel Svoboda. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.
  22. Thein, Karel. 2003. "Teleology and Myth in the Protagoras". In Plato's Protagoras. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Platonicum Pragense, editovali Aleš Havlíček a Filip Karfík, 60-70. Praha: OIKOYMENH.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.