Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 31/2024:90-103 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2024.008

Co je imanence? Renesance imanence versus imanence v renesanci.

Tomáš Nejeschleba
Filozofická fakulta Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci

The term immanence in philosophy is associated with the modern era, but according to some advocates of the so-called philosophy of immanence, which begins with Descartes and culminates with Hegel (G. Gentile), its foundations were laid already in the Renaissance, especially Giordano Bruno is mentioned in this context. Following this statement, the article focuses on the Renaissance notion of immanence. The concept was understood primarily as an epistemological category, based on the reading of Aristotle and his
medieval commentators, and relates to the problem of the activities of the human soul. In contrast, immanence as a metaphysical category did not appear explicitly until the seventeenth century, but the connection with Neo-Platonism and its Renaissance forms is often pointed out. The connection appears both in the doctrine of the immanence of the world soul in the world within panpsychism and in pantheistic
speculations about the presence of the divine in the world.

Received: July 9, 2024; Revised: September 16, 2024; Accepted: September 27, 2024; Published: January 11, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nejeschleba, T. (2024). Co je imanence? Renesance imanence versus imanence v renesanci. Aither16(31), 90-103. doi: 10.5507/aither.2024.008
Download citation

References

  1. Aquinas, Thomas. 1953. "Quaestione disputatae de potentia Dei". In Quaestiones disputatae, Vol. II, ed. Marietti, 7-276. Torino.
  2. Aquinas, Thomas. 1969. Sententia libri Ethicorum. Editio Leonina. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/ctc0101.html.
  3. Blum, Paul Richard. 1980. Aristoteles bei Giordano Bruno : Studien zur philosophischen Rezeption. Die Geistesgeschichte und ihre Methoden. München: W. Fink.
  4. Bruno, Giordano. 1958. Dialoghi italiani: dialoghi metafisici e dialoghi morali. Ed. Giovanni Gentile a Giovanni Aquilecchia. Firenze: Sansoni.
  5. Bruno, Giordano. 1962. "Summa terminorum metaphysicorum". In Iordani Bruni Nolani Opera Latine Conscripta, Vol I, Pars IV, 1-128. Stuttgart - Bad Cannstatt: Frommann - Holzboog.
  6. Bruno, Giordano. 2008. Dialogy. Přel. Jan Blahoslav Kozák. Praha: Academia.
  7. Bruno, Giordano. 2010. Das Buch über die Monade, die Zahl und die Figur. Frankfurt 1591. Ed. Wolfgang Neuser, Michael Spang, a Erhard Wicke. Nordhausen: Traugott Bautz.
  8. Cassirer, Ernst. 1922. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, Zweiter Band. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.
  9. Chene, Dennis Des. 1996. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca, N.Y., N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  10. Chene, Dennis Des. 2000. Life's Form: Late Aristotelian Conceptions of the Soul. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
  11. Copenhaver, Brian - Copenhaver, Rebecca. 2012. From Kant to Croce. Modern Philosophy in Italy 1800-1950. Toronto ; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. Go to original source...
  12. Deleuze, Gilles. 2001. Pure Immanence. Essays on A Life. Přel. Anne Boyman. New York: Urzone, Inc.
  13. Deleuze, Gilles. 2014. Záhyb. Leibniz a baroko. Přel. Marie Caruccio Caporale. Praha: Herrmann & synové.
  14. Deleuze, Gilles. 2016. Spinoza. Praktická filosofie. Přel. Martin Vrabec. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  15. Deleuze, Gilles - Guattari, Félix. 2001. Co je filosofie? Přel. Miroslav Petříček. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  16. Duns Scotus, Johannes. 1891. Quaestiones subtilissimae in Metaphysicam. Ed. Lucas Wadding. Vol. 7. Paris: Vives.
  17. Ficino, Marsilio. 2001. Platonic theology. Books I-IV. Ed. Michael J B Allen - James Hankins. (I Tatti Renaissance library. I). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  18. George, Marie I. 2014. "On the Meaning of "Immanent Activity" According to Aquinas". The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review 78 (4): 537-55. Go to original source...
  19. Goclenius, Rudolph. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur. Francofurt: Typis Mathiae Beckeri.
  20. Haynes, Patrice. 2012. Immanent Transcendence. Reconfiguring Materialism in Continental Philosophy. London; New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  21. Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. 1997. O Spinozově učení v dopisech panu Mojžíši Mendelssohnovi. Přel. Jaromír Loužil. Oikoymenh: Praha.
  22. Knox, Dilwyn. 2013. "Bruno: Immanence and Transcendence in De la causa, Principio et Uno, Dialog II". Bruniana & Campanelliana 19 (2): 463-82.
  23. Koszteyn, Jolanta. 2003. "Actio immanens - A Fundamental Concept of Biological Investigation". Forum philosophicum 8: 81-120. Go to original source...
  24. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 2007. Osm filosofů italské renesance. Přel. Tomáš Nejeschleba. Praha: Vyšehrad.
  25. Michalík, Jiří. 2019. Cornelius Agrippa mezi magií a humanismem. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého Olomouc.
  26. Nejeschleba, Tomáš. 2014. "Principy filosofie Pietra Pomponazziho - hledání "pravého" aristotelismu". AITHER. Časopis pro studium řecké a latinské filosofické tradice 7 (11): 38-47. Go to original source...
  27. Nejeschleba, Tomáš. 2016. "Formy panpsychismu v renesanční filosofii". Studia Comeniana et historica 46 (95-96): 70-85.
  28. Nejeschleba, Tomáš. 2018. "Proč se hovoří o panteismu v renesanční filosofii?" Pro-Fil 19 (1): 2-18. Go to original source...
  29. Nejeschleba, Tomáš. 2019. "Immanence, Renaissance Idea of". In Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Marco Sgarbi. Springer International Publishing. Go to original source...
  30. Nejeschleba, Tomáš. 2024. "Is Immanence the Precondition of Giordano Bruno's Panpsychism and Pantheism?" Giornale di Metafisica 1/2024: 3-15.
  31. Oeing-Hanhoff, Ludger. 1976. "Immanent, Immanenz". In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 4:221-37. Basel: Schwabe.
  32. Pomponazzi, Pietro. 2012. O nesmrtelnosti duše. Přel. Miroslav Petříček. Praha: Oikoymenh.
  33. Pospíšil, Ctirad Václav. 2007. Jako v nebi tak i na zemi. Náčrt trinitární teologie. Kostelní Vydří: Karmelitánské nakladatelství.
  34. Rubini, Rocco. 2014. The Other Renaissance. Italian Humanism between Hegel and Heidegger. Chicago ; London: University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  35. Spindler, Fredrika. 2010. "Gilles Deleuze: A Philosophy of Immanence". In Phenomenology and Religion: New Frontiers, ed. Jonna Bornemark a Hans Ruin, 149-63. Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.
  36. Spinoza, Benedictus de. 2001. Etika. Přel. Karel Hubka. 2. vyd. Praha: Dybbuk.
  37. Thomas, Peter. 2008. "Immanence". Historical Materialism 16: 239-43. Go to original source...
  38. Thomas, Peter. 2009. The Gramscian Moment. Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Leiden ; Boston: Brill. Go to original source...
  39. Zabarella, Giacomo. 2016. De rebus naturalibus. Ed. José Manuel García Valverde. Leiden: Brill.
  40. Zylstra, Stephen John. 2018. "Immanent Causation in Spinoza and Scholasticism". University of Toronto.
  41. Zylstra, Stephen John. 2020. "Spinoza on Action and Immanent Causation". Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (1): 29-55. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.