Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither, 2009 (vol. 1), issue 1

Aither 1/2009

Foreword

Předmluva k prvnímu číslu

Kryštof Boháček

Aither 1/2009:2-8  

Articles

Phusis in the Presocratics

Pavel Hobza

Aither 1/2009:9-22 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.002  

According to the tradition, most Presocratics should have titled their works as Peri phuseos ("On Nature"). Although it is now mostly supposed that the Presocratic s did not label their works with this title, the question arises whether they were engaged in the investigation peri phuseos or, in the other words, whether they used phusis as a philosophical concept, i.e., as an object of their philosophical investigation. The question is all the more important if we take into account that the Milesians are often considered to be the first philosophers because of their concern in the regularity and orderliness of Nature ( phusis) as contrasted with divine...

Gorgiás 447a-448e or Delayed Prologue

Kryštof Boháček

Aither 1/2009:23-41 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.003  

The paper focuses on the first part of the dialogue (Gor. 447a-448e), usually dismissed by scholars as a mere prelude. However, author shows how essential this part is for the interpretation of the debate between Socrates and Gorgias and moreover for understanding of the dialogue and its structure as a whole. Base of Kryštof Bohaček's methodology is emphasis on the dialogical reading, research of literary form and their relevance for the philosophy.On the basis of structural analogy with an attic tragedy, role of the prelude is identified first, through which the short debate "with Pol" is presented as another fundamental key to contextual interpretation....

Cena Trimalchionis a Plato's Symposion

Jiří Šubrt

Aither 1/2009:42-51 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.004  

Petronius' Cena Trimalchionis is first of all a display of culinary extravagancies and intellectual paltriness of the participants. However, most researchers agree that in some passages the Roman author parodies a sophisticated philosophical dialogue - Plato's Symposium. A passage like that is held to be the conversation of freedmen in chapters 41-47 whose discussion in the absence of their host has certain structural similarities with Plato's model. As the Italian researcher F. Bessone showed, in both works the conversation of the participants has the form of a convivial agon (despite not being formally proclaimed in Cena Trimalchionis), the number...

Antiaverroism in the works of Thomas Aquinas

Jozef Matula

Aither 1/2009:52-61 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.005  

The article deals with the relation of Thomas Aquinas to the problem of one intellect in the thought of the Arabic thinker Averroes. The first part pays attention to selected aspects of Aquinas' criticism of the theory that proclaims the existence of one collective soul and one common intellect. On the background of the epistemological questions, which concern the theory of species intelligibilis, phantasms, the theory of coniunctio, or the intelligibility of separated substances, the author tries to elucidate Aquinas' arguments against not only Averroes but also other thinkers (Themistius, Theofrastus, Avicenna, Avempace). In the second part of the...

Theological determinism resulting from God's causality and its predeinistic solution in early New Ages scholasticism

Petr Dvořák

Aither 1/2009:62-76 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.006  

The paper deals with the problem of theological determinism. It formulates a specimen of deterministic argument based on the fact that in classical theism God is regarded as the First Cause, i.e. ontologically responsible for the being and specificity of every actual entity. Then it examines a compatibilist solution proposed by D. Alvarez in the early 17 th century. It is found to be acceptable only if some assumptions are granted. These are by no means obvious, nevertheless the final judgment is left to the reader to make.

Reviews

Mnohost hlasů Platónovy rétoriky: jedna řeč pro filosofii i sofistiku

Kryštof Boháček

Aither 1/2009:117-119 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.008  

Dialog

Pásmo z kolokvia Filosofického ústavu Akademie věd ČR s tématem: Proč se dnes zabývat antickou a středověkou filosofií?

Aither 1/2009:77-116 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2009.007