Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 14/2015:8-33 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2015.012

Plato's Concept of the Political and the Problem of Political Distribution in the Republic

Jakub Jinek
Filosofická fakulta UK

The paper claims that in Plato there is a concept of the political whose irreducibility on one hand arises from the original multiplicity of people and their interests as well as from their sense of community and which on the other hand is rooted in Platonic dialectics of unity and multiplicity. To reveal this, the paper focuses on the problem of political distribution as conceived in the Republic by discussing the occurences of the idea of "doing one's own". The Republic offers a reflexive way of dealing with such pieces of traditional ethical teaching by retrieving - in a series of reformulations - its philosophical content but also by making use of its possible ambiguities as a signal of irreducibility of the sphere of the political.

Published: September 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jinek, J. (2015). Plato's Concept of the Political and the Problem of Political Distribution in the Republic. Aither7(14), 8-33. doi: 10.5507/aither.2015.012
Download citation

References

  1. Adam, J. (1963). The Republic of Plato, I. Vyd. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  2. Annas, J. (1997). "Politics and Ethics in Plato's Republic". In: O. Höffe (ed.), Platon, Politeia, Berlin: Akademie Verlag, s. 141-60. Go to original source...
  3. Arendt, H. (1993). Was ist Politik? Fragmente aus dem Nachlaß. München: Piper.
  4. Arendtová, H. (1993). "Filosofie a politika". Česká mysl 3, s. 1-21.
  5. Arendtová, H. (2007). Vita activa, neboli, O činném životě (přel. V. Němec). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  6. Bloom, A. (1991). The Republic of Plato. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Donovan, B. R. (2003). "The Do-It-Yourselfer in Plato's Republic". American Journal of Philology 124, s. 1-18. Go to original source...
  8. Friedländer, P. (1975). Platon/3, Die platonischen Schriften, zweite und dritte Periode. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  9. Gaiser, K. (1963). Platons ungeschriebene Lehre; Studien zur systematischen und geschichtlichen Begründung der Wissenschaften in der Platonischen Schule. Stuttgart: Klett.
  10. Gigon, O. (1974). Platon, Frühdialoge: Laches, Charmides, Lysis, Der grössere Hippias, Der kleinere Hippias, Protagoras, Euthydemos, Ion, Menexenos. Zürich: Artemis.
  11. Graeser, A. (2000). Řecká filosofie klasického období (přel. M. Petříček). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  12. Havlíček, A. (1998). "Die Kritik Platons an Glaukons Auffassung des besten Staates". In: A. Havlíček, F. Karfík (eds.), The Republic and the Laws of Plato, Prague: OIKOYMENH, s. 46-66.
  13. Havlíček, A. (2015). Dialog, etika a politika: studie k Platónovým raným a středním dialogům. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  14. Hennis,W. (1963). Politik und praktische Philosophie. Eine Studie zur Rekonstruktion der politischen Wissenschaft, Neuwied a. Rh. - Berlin: Luchterhand.
  15. Jinek, J. (2009), Gerechtigkeit zwischen Tugend und Gesetz, Saarbrücken: SVH.
  16. Kersting, W. (1999). Platons Staat. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  17. Krämer, H. J. (1959). Arete bei Platon und Aristoteles. Zum Wesen und zur Geschichte der platonischen Ontologie. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
  18. Krämer, H. (2015). "Platónská Akademie a problém systematické interpretace Platónovy filosofie". Reflexe 49, s. 113-143.
  19. Krüger, G. (1992). Einsicht und Leidenschaft, Das Wesen des platonischen Denkens. Vyd. 6. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann.
  20. Lane, M. S. (1999). "Plato, Popper, Strauss, and Utopianism: Open Secrets?". History of Philosophy Quarterly 16, s. 119-142.
  21. Notomi, N. (2000). "Critias and the Origin of Plato's Political Philosophy". In: T. M. Robinson, L. Brisson (eds.), Plato: Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides: Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum, s. 237-250
  22. Nussbaumová, M. C. (2003). Křehkost dobra (přel. D. Korte, M. Ritter). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  23. Ottmann, H. (2001). Geschichte des politischen Denkens: von den Anfängen bei den Griechen bis auf unsere Zeit/1, 2 Bd. 1, Die Griechen; Teilbd. 2, Von Platon bis zum Hellenismus. Stuttgart: Metzler. Go to original source...
  24. Reale, G. (2005). Platón. Pokus o novou interpretaci velkých Platónových dialogů ve světle nepsaných nauk (přel. M. Cajthaml). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  25. Schmitt, C. (2007). Pojem politična (přel. O. Vochoč). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  26. Strauss, L. (1995a). "Co je politická filosofie". In: A. Havlíček (ed.), Eseje o politické filosofii (přel. M. Mocek, V. Sochor, J. Šindelář), Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 11-49.
  27. Strauss, L. (1995b). "Ke klasické politické filosofii". In: A. Havlíček (ed.), Eseje o politické filosofii (přel. M. Mocek, V. Sochor, J. Šindelář), Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 50-64.
  28. Strauss, L. (2007). Obec a člověk. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  29. Szlezák, T. A. (1985). Platon und die Schriftlichkeit der Philosophie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  30. Tuozzo, T. M. (2000). "Greetings form Apollo: Charmides 164c-165b, Epistle III, and the Structure of Charmides". In: T. M. Robinson, L. Brisson (eds.), Plato: Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides: Proceedings of the V Symposium Platonicum, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, s. 296-305.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.