Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 15/2016:4-29 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2016.001

Causality and Nature in the Hippocratic Treatises

Pavel Hobza
Filosofický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.

In my paper I am dealing with the problem when and in what form the notion of causality appeared in ancient Greece. It is mostly assumed that already the Presocratics (even the Milesians) dealt with causes. However, none of the extant Presocratic fragments mentions the Greek term for cause (aitia or aition), which is why we should look for the origin of the conception of causality elsewhere. The elaborate conception of causality is to be found in the Corpus Hippocraticum, whose oldest texts originate from the second half of the fifth century B. C. As the close analysis of the Hippocratic treatise On the Sacred Disease suggests, here we find a very complex causal theory articulated by means of the concept phusis. Although there are few occurrences of the term phusis in the Presocratics, they used it only in the common meaning "true nature", not referring to its etymology, i.e. "growth". By exploiting its etymological implications the Hippocratic authors were able to conceive of it as a fundamental causal factor.

Published: March 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hobza, P. (2016). Causality and Nature in the Hippocratic Treatises. Aither8(15), 4-29. doi: 10.5507/aither.2016.001
Download citation

References

  1. Aristotelés (2008). Metafyzika (přel. A. Kříž). Praha: Rezek.
  2. Bartoš, H. (2008). "Koncept lidské přirozenosti v hippokratovském lékařství". In: L. Chvátal, V. Hušek (eds.), "Přirozenost" ve filosofii minulosti a současnosti. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, s. 9-23.
  3. Bartoš, H. (2012). "O životosprávě I. Úvod". In: Hippokratés, Vybrané spisy, I (eds. H. Bartoš, S. Fischerová). Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 417-456.
  4. Burge, E. L. (1971). "The Ideas as Aitiai in the Phaedo". Phronesis 16, s. 1-13. Go to original source...
  5. Daneš, J. (2008). "Kritická diskuse o pojmu lidské přirozenosti v hippokratovském spisu Peri archaiés iétrikés". In: L. Chvátal, V. Hušek (eds.), "Přirozenost" ve filosofii minulosti a současnosti. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, s. 24-33.
  6. Diels, H., Kranz, W. (1969). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6. Aufl. Zürich: Weidmann.
  7. Dodds, E. R. (2000). Řekové a iracionálno. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  8. Eijk, P. J. van der (2005). "The 'theology' of the Hippocratic treatise On the Sacred Disease". In: P. J. van der Eijk, Medicine and Philosophy in Classical Antiquity: Doctors and Philosophers on Nature, Soul, Health and Disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 45-73. Go to original source...
  9. Fischerová, S. (2012). "Úvodní studie". In: Hippokratés, Vybrané spisy, I (eds. H. Bartoš, S. Fischerová). Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 15-146.
  10. Fischerová, S., Beran, A. (eds.) (2012). Medicína mezi jedinečným a univerzálním. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
  11. Frede, M. (1987). "The Original Notion of Cause". In: M. Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, s. 125-150.
  12. Grensemann, H. (1968). Die hippokratische Schrift "Über die heilige Krankheit". Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  13. Hankinson, R. J. (1998). Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  14. Heidel, W. (1906). "Πϵρὶ Φύσϵωϛ. A Study of the Conception of Nature among the Pre-Socratics". Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 19, s. 333-379. Go to original source...
  15. Hippokratés (1849). Oeuvres complètes d'Hippocrate, VI (ed. a přel. É. Littré). Paris: J. R. Baillière.
  16. Hippokratés (1923a). Hippocrates, I (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann.
  17. Hippokratés (1923b). Hippocrates, II (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann.
  18. Hippokratés (1958). Hippocrates, IV (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann.
  19. Hippokratés (2003). La maladie sacreé (ed. J. Jouanna). Paris: Belles lettres.
  20. Hippokratés (2012). Vybrané spisy, I (eds. H. Bartoš, S. Fischerová). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  21. Hobza, P. (2009). " Fysis u předsókratiků". Aither 1, s. 9-22. Go to original source...
  22. Hobza, P. (2015). "Je skutečně zjevné, že Aristotelovi předchůdci hovořili o příčinách? (Met. 983b3)". Aither 13, s. 46-55. Go to original source...
  23. Jones, W. H. S. (1923a). "General Introduction". In: Hippokratés, Hippocrates, I (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann, s. VII-LXIX.
  24. Jones, W. H. S. (1923b). "The Sacred Disease. Introduction". In: Hippokratés, Hippocrates, II (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann, s. 129-137.
  25. Jones, W. H. S. (1958). "Introduction". In: Hippokratés, Hippocrates, IV (přel. W. H. S. Jones). London: Heinemann, s. IX-LVIII.
  26. Jouanna, J. (1984). "Rhétorique et médicine dans la collection hippocratique". Revue des Études Grecques 97, s. 26-44. Go to original source...
  27. Jouanna, J. (2003a). "Notes complémentaires". In: Hippokratés, La maladie sacreé (ed. J. Jouanna). Paris: Belles lettres, s. 35-138.
  28. Jouanna, J. (2003b). "Notice". In: Hippokratés, La maladie sacreé (ed. J. Jouanna). Paris: Belles lettres, s. VII-CXXXIII.
  29. Kirkwood, G. M. (1952). "Thucydides' Words for 'Cause'". The American Journal of Philology 73, s. 37-61. Go to original source...
  30. Klouda, J. (2012). "O umění. Úvod". In: Hippokratés, Vybrané spisy, I (eds. H. Bartoš, S. Fischerová). Praha: OIKOYMENH, s. 291-309.
  31. Kočandrle, R. (2008). Fysis iónských myslitelů: rozprava nad peripatetickou dezinterpretací. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
  32. Kočandrle, R. (2010). Anaximandros z Mílétu. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
  33. Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., Jones, H. S. (1996). Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979). Magic, Reason and Experience. Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Lonie, I. M. (1981). The Hippocratic Treatises "On Generation", "On the Nature of the Child", "Diseases IV": A Commentary. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Go to original source...
  36. Lovejoy, A. O. (1909). "The Meaning of Φ ύσις in the Greek Physiologers". The Philosophical Review 18, s. 383-396. Go to original source...
  37. Naddaf, G. (2005). The Greek Concept of Nature. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Go to original source...
  38. Platón (1994). Faidón (přel. F. Novotný). Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  39. Pohlenz, M. (1953). "Nomos und Physis". Hermes 81, s. 418-438.
  40. Rawlings, H. R. (1975). A Semantic Study of Prophasis to 400 B.C. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
  41. Thein, K. (2012). "Lidská přirozenost a její rozmanitost v Corpus Hippocraticum". In: S. Fischerová, A. Beran (eds.), Medicína mezi jedinečným a univerzálním. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
  42. Vlastos, G. (1969). "Reasons and Causes in the Phaedo". The Philosophical Review 78, s. 291-325. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.