Aither is a double-blind peer review, Open Access online academic journal. It is indexed at ERIH+ and Scopus. It is published by the Faculty of Arts of the Palacký University in Olomouc in cooperation with the Philosophical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. It comes out twice a year. Every second issue is international and contains foreign-language articles (mainly in English, but also in German and French). The journal is registered under the number ISSN 1803-7860.

Aither 15/2016:72-83 | DOI: 10.5507/aither.2016.004

Aristotle's Reflection on the Tragic Concept of Cause

Kryštof Boháček
Filosofický ústav AV ČR

The article explores the possibility of Aristotle's inspiration by tragic thought in the topic of cause. In the first part, the author presents a general exposure of the theory of causes in Aristotle's philosophy. The second part focuses on the issue of cause in Posterior Analytics. In the third part the relation between cause and chance is analysed. The author builds on his earlier exploration of interrelation between nature and the human world in Aristotle. According to Boháček, Aristotle's conceptualization of this relationship is the result of reflection of the older conception of fate and chance.
Therefore, the fourth and largest part examines in extenso the textual evidence of the word-root "cause" in Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides. Consequently, the author identifies a unified concept of the "tragic cause" and concludes with the view of the Aristotelian theory of cause as i.a. a result of broader reflection of an older tragic concept.

Published: March 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boháček, K. (2016). Aristotle's Reflection on the Tragic Concept of Cause. Aither8(15), 72-83. doi: 10.5507/aither.2016.004
Download citation

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.) (2009). Blackwell Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Go to original source...
  2. Aubenque, P. (2003). Rozumnost podle Aristotela. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  3. Boháček, K. (2013). "Fysis v rétorice". Aither 10, s. 7-32. Go to original source...
  4. Boháček, K. (2015). "Platónova theorétická archéologie Dobra". In: K. Boháček, K. Jiráková (eds.), Platonica Pilonica IV. Dobro. Plzeň: Vydavatelství Západočeské univerzity v Plzni, s. 107-120.
  5. Boháček, K. (2016). "Fronésis a svobodné rozhodnutí". Filozofia 71(5), s. 389-400.
  6. Boháček, K., Jiráková, K. (2015). Platonica Pilonica IV. Dobro. Plzeň: Vydavatelství Západočeské univerzity v Plzni.
  7. Broadie, S. (2009). "Heavenly Bodies and First Causes". In: G. Anagnostopoulos (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, s. 230-241. Go to original source...
  8. Bronstein, D. (2010). "Meno's Paradox in Posterior Analytics 1.1.". Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38, s. 115-141.
  9. Dodds, E. R. (2000). Řekové a iracionálno. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  10. Gadamer, H. G. (2010). Idea Dobra mezi Platónem a Aristotelem. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  11. Hankinson, R. J. (2009). "Causes". In: G. Anagnostopoulos (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Aristotle. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, s. 213-229. Go to original source...
  12. Höffe, O. (2003). Aristotle. New York: State University of New York Press. Go to original source...
  13. Nussbaumová, M. C. (2003). Křehkost dobra. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
  14. Parker, R. (1996). Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  15. Ross, D. (1995). Aristotle. London & NY: Routledge.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.